The best thing I’ve read this week is this essay in Pitchfork by Tom Ewing “on trollgaze, streams, and nanoculture” which really nails internet culture and tries to understand it as an artform in its own right:
http://pitchfork.com/features/poptimist/8724-take-me-to-the-river/
Some killer quotes:
“One of the most energizing things about nanoculture is that it's a culture of making: building things, trying ideas out, and exploiting loopholes.”
“Replication is perfect-- the content is preserved unaltered. Imitation is imperfect-- the content changes as it spreads. On the side of replication are advertisers looking for a spot that will "go viral," Facebook and its "frictionless sharing," Apple and its beautifully sealed interfaces, and most content owners. On the side of imitation are fan communities, wikis, and the great meme-hives of the web like 4chan and Reddit.”
“Imitation is collaborative: It might be technically possible to dig back and find the originator of, say, Socially Awkward Penguin or Privilege Denying Dude, but the knowledge would be perfectly useless. Whatever life or value these things have lies in their reuse.”
“When something replicates, on the other hand, following the trail backwards can be illuminating, perhaps ending up at digital marketing agencies, PR people, or political groups. All of whom could exploit imitative culture too, but often shy away from it because control over the message remains so vital to them.”
“The effort that goes into making, for instance, a video where a herd of sheep form a giant LED display, seems absurdly disproportionate to the attention any given viewer will pay to it. Sheep! Lit up! Cool! The End!”